1. Thats wrong
2. Partly true, but you can organize it and remove unwanted things
3. Partly agree, but also this way you can find them directly and fast
4. Thats wrong
5. Code is old, true, but that doesn't mean it's loading slow. Generally it loads faster then Joomla or many other systems, because its less complex. But true, plugins often make it slower to laod, but thats the same for other systems.
6. That depends on you and your setup and is the same for all systems.
7. That depends on you and your setup and is the same for all systems.
8. That depends on you and your setup and is the same for all systems.
9. That depends on you and your setup and is the same for all systems.
10. Thats part of the game, if you have the most popular system, also attackers would target it most, but that also means, many security problems are already fixed, while not popular systems haven't. And often those come from bad coded plugins (same for other systems).
11. Depends on your setup and same for other systems
12. never saw that, must also be your setup.
In generall all systems have advantages or disadvantages, it is always a personal thing, what you like more.
I used Joomla from the beginning (Mango) and through all versions. And after more then 13 years I completly switched to wordpress, because for me and customers it is the better system.
I would not say, that I like it, but its doing its job and is better in case of usability, functionallity, themes, plugins and maintainability.
DON'T MESS WITH ME
1- Have you ever used WordPress in your life? I've been using CMS for 12 years, and I've tried everything. So don't bother me.
2- NO, it's not partly true, it's completely true, the admin panel is crap.
3- If you "partially" agree, you know I'm right, but you don't want to admit it because it clashes with your pathetic, fanatical emotions of WordPress addiction.
4- Tu concha de tu madre es incorrect.
5- THAT'S NOT TRUE, the code is outdated and the admin page with Betheme and Elementor takes 2 minutes to load, it's slower than Joomla.
6- It doesn't depend on anything; my IIS is perfect for hosting all CMSs, and WP has more conflicts than any other.
7- It doesn't depend on anything; my IIS is perfect for hosting all CMSs, and WP has more conflicts than any other.
8- It doesn't depend on anything; my IIS is perfect for hosting all CMSs, and WP has more conflicts than any other.
9- It doesn't depend on anything; my IIS is perfect for hosting all CMSs, and WP has more conflicts than any other.
10- What game are you talking about, idiot? WordPress is the most vulnerable because it has no security. They focus on adding money and a front-end to make it look pretty, but in terms of functionality it's pathetic, miserable, and deplorable.
11- What kind of configuration are you talking about, you stupid imbecile? I've been using WP for 3 years and don't come at me arguing that xcon is the best in the history of the universe, because it's not true.
12- There are flaws in your mentally disturbed mind; it must be your configuration. Check your mental configuration.
My question to AI
General Features
Joomla 6 stands out for its deep core modernizations:
Automatic core updates (a major new feature, enabled by default on new installations, using The Update Framework - TUF for enhanced security).
Cleaner and refactored code (removal of legacy code, improved compatibility with PHP 8.2+).
Accessibility improvements, integrated extended Cassiopeia template, and new field types.
Focus on inclusivity and simplicity.
WordPress 6.9 focuses on the editing experience and performance:
A more polished Site Editor with advanced design controls and improved global styles.
New blocks (accordion, elastic text, term lookup, reading time, math support).
Global command palette and media aspect ratio options.
Frontend performance optimizations (improved lazy loading, reduced render-blocking resources, up to 20% faster in some cases).
Verdict: Joomla offers more out-of-the-box features (advanced ACL, native multilingual support). WordPress shines in visual flexibility and collaboration thanks to Gutenberg.
Key Features
Both are complete CMS platforms for blogs, corporate websites, and e-commerce, but they differ in approach:
Joomla 6:
Advanced user and permissions management (powerful built-in ACL).
Native components for articles, menus, modules, and categories.
Excellent support for multilingual and complex sites (ideal for institutional portals or those with strict workflows).
Extensions (~8,000), but more controlled and with less dependency on third parties.
WordPress 6.9:
Collaborative block editor (comments per block, improved drag and drop).
Mature full-site editing + thousands of plugins (~60,000) and themes for any function (WooCommerce, SEO, forms, etc.). Team collaboration tools and modern APIs (ready for AI and dynamic content).
Ideal for bloggers, content sites, and fast-paced online stores.
Verdict: Joomla for structured projects with granular control. WordPress for rapid development and scalability through its ecosystem (more plugins = more fast features, but more maintenance).
Security
Both are secure at core if kept up to date, but the approach and risk differ:
Joomla 6:
Stronger core security model (granular ACLs, content filtering, file permissions).
Automatic core updates (drastically reduces the risk of outdated sites).
Smaller attack surface (lower market share ~2-3%, fewer vulnerable extensions).
Frequent security patches (e.g., XSS fixes and URL filtering in 6.0.2). Historically fewer reported core vulnerabilities.
WordPress 6.9:
Very solid core (only ~4-7 core vulnerabilities in recent years), but the plugin/theme ecosystem generates most problems (95%+ of CVEs).
~7,966 vulnerabilities reported in the ecosystem in 2024-2025 (mainly plugins).
Improvements in 6.9: secure default configurations, SSRF and PoP-chain fixes in 6.9.2.
Requires security plugins (Wordfence, etc.) and frequent manual updates. Larger target due to popularity (~43% of the web).
Verdict: Joomla has an advantage in out-of-the-box security and with the new automatic updates. WordPress is secure with good hygiene (updates + reliable plugins), but requires more vigilance due to the volume of attacks.
Stability
Joomla 6:
Explicit focus on stability (clean code, fewer legacy bugs, fewer emergency patches needed recently).
Automatic updates keep the platform stable and secure in the long term.
Better backward/forward compatibility and performance on complex sites.
WordPress 6.9:
Refinement and stability as core themes (80+ fixes in betas, better handling of large databases, cache optimizations).
Frequent and mature releases (every 3-4 months). Official PHP 8.5 support and improvements for high-traffic sites.
Very stable in production, especially with optimized hosting.
Verdict: Both are extremely stable. Joomla 6 wins slightly thanks to automatic updates and architectural cleanup. WordPress offers proven stability at massive scale thanks to its huge community.
Comparative table
| ASPECTS | JOOMLA 6 | WP 6.9 | WINNER |
| Characteristics | Auto updates, clean code, native ACL | Collaborative editor, new blocks, performance | Joomla (integrated) |
| Functions | Complex structure, powerful multilingual | plugin system, fast blogging | Joomla (complex) |
| Security | Strong core + auto-updates; lower risk | Core is safe, but plugins = more CVEs | Joomla (core) |
| Stability | Deep cleaning + auto-updates | Optimizations + frequent fixes | Tie (Joomla slight advantage) |
| Ease os use | Medium-high learning curve | Very intuitive (ideal for beginners) | WordPress |
| community | Dedicated and professional | Enormous (unlimited resources) | WordPress |
JOOMLA 3 WIN, Tie and WP 2 Win.
FINAL Joomla 3 vs WP 2
WINNER JOOMLA 6
